Assignment Help Center
Services
Editing
Samples
Free AI Tools
About Us
Order Now WhatsApp
Free Self-Check Tool

AI-Writing Risk Checker

Paste your draft to see how much it reads like typical AI-generated text. This tool highlights writing-style signals such as uniform sentences, repetition, and generic phrasing so you can revise in your own voice before you submit.

Runs in your browser Nothing uploaded No signup Free to use
Your Text 0 words
Indicative Result

Paste your text on the left and click
Check My Writing
Read this first. These are indicative writing-style signals, not a definitive AI-detection verdict. No tool — including this one — can prove who wrote a piece of text or confirm whether AI was used. Human writing can score high and AI-assisted writing can score low. Use the result as self-check guidance to improve your draft, never as proof of authorship.
What We Measure

The Writing-Style Signals Explained

The score combines four style signals. None of them proves AI use on its own — together they simply describe how uniform and generic your writing reads.

Sentence Variety

Measures how much your sentence lengths differ. AI drafts often keep a steady, uniform rhythm, whereas human writing tends to mix long and short sentences.

Repetition

Looks at repeated words and two-word phrases. A narrow vocabulary and recycled phrasing can read as machine-generated or under-edited.

Generic Phrasing

Counts common filler phrases such as "it is important to note" or "plays a crucial role" that appear frequently in AI-assisted writing.

Lexical Diversity

Compares unique words against total words. Very low diversity suggests repetitive language; healthy diversity suggests a richer, more personal style.

How It Works

Check Your Draft in 3 Steps

1

Paste Your Text

Add at least 100 words of your own writing. Everything runs inside your browser — your text is never sent to a server or stored anywhere.

2

Read the Signals

See an indicative 0-100 score with a Low, Moderate, or Elevated band, plus a plain-English breakdown of each writing-style signal.

3

Revise in Your Voice

Use the pointers to vary your sentences, trim filler, and add your own analysis. Rewrite anything that reads generic so the work sounds like you.

Want a Human Editor to Review Your Draft?

Leave your details and our academic team will get back to you about editing, proofreading, or writing support. Optional — the checker above works without it.

We reply from orders@assignmenthelpcenter.com. Your text is never included automatically.
Student Guide

Understanding AI Detection and Its Limits

AI-writing detection has become a common worry for students, but it is widely misunderstood. This checker exists to help you self-review your draft honestly — not to hand down a verdict. Below we explain what the signals mean, how real detectors work, and how to make your writing sound more like you.

What Do the Signals Actually Measure?

The score is built from measurable style patterns: how much your sentence lengths vary, how often words and phrases repeat, how many generic filler phrases appear, and how varied your vocabulary is. Text that is very uniform, repetitive, and full of stock phrasing tends to score higher. That is a statement about writing style only — it is not evidence that any particular tool was used. Strong human academic writing, especially in a formal register, can trigger these signals too.

How Do Real AI Detectors Work — and Why Are They Unreliable?

Commercial AI detectors usually estimate two things: perplexity (how predictable the word choices are) and burstiness (how much sentence length varies). Predictable, uniform text is scored as more likely to be machine-generated. The problem is that these are only probabilities, not proof. Independent studies and the vendors themselves acknowledge meaningful error rates. Detectors have wrongly flagged human work — including writing by non-native English speakers, whose phrasing can look more uniform — and they can be fooled by lightly edited machine text. Because of this, many universities have stopped treating detector scores as standalone evidence of misconduct. No detector can reconstruct the history of how a document was written, so none can truly prove authorship.

How to Write More Naturally

If your draft reads generic, a few habits help. Vary your sentence length deliberately — follow a long, complex sentence with a short, punchy one. Cut filler openers like "in today's world" and "it is important to note" and get straight to the point. Add specifics: real examples, named studies, figures, and your own critical analysis rather than broad summary. Read your work aloud to catch repeated phrasing, and replace recycled words with more precise ones. Most importantly, make an argument that reflects your own reading and thinking; that voice is very hard to fake.

A Note on Academic Integrity

Using AI tools responsibly is not the same as submitting AI-written work as your own. Always follow your institution's policy on AI use, and disclose assistance where required. This checker is a self-review aid to help you produce genuine, well-referenced work — not a way to disguise text or evade detection. If you are stretched for time, our editors can help you strengthen and properly reference your own draft. You can also request expert human-written support when you need original work produced from scratch.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

No. It does not identify any specific AI system and cannot confirm whether AI was used. It measures writing-style signals such as sentence variety, repetition, and generic phrasing, then gives an indicative score. Treat it as self-review guidance only, not a detection verdict.

We deliberately do not claim any accuracy percentage, because no such figure would be honest. The score reflects style patterns only. Genuine human writing can score high and AI-assisted text can score low, so the result should never be read as proof of how a piece was written.

No. The analysis runs entirely in your browser using JavaScript. Your text is never sent to a server, never saved, and never shared. When you close or refresh the page it is gone.

Formal academic writing is often uniform and phrase-heavy, which can raise the signals even when the work is entirely your own. This is exactly why the tool is indicative, not conclusive. Use the breakdown to vary your sentences and cut filler if you wish, but a high score is not evidence of wrongdoing.

No tool can prove authorship in either direction. A low score is not proof of innocence and a high score is not proof of misconduct. If you are asked about your process, the best evidence is your own drafts, notes, and sources showing how your work developed.

At least 100 words. Style signals are unstable on very short passages, so shorter text will not be scored. For the most reliable read, paste several complete paragraphs rather than a single sentence.

Vary your sentence lengths, remove stock openers such as "in conclusion" and "in today's world", and add specific examples and your own analysis. You can also rework AI-assisted drafts with our AI text humaniser and tidy grammar with the grammar checker.

It depends entirely on your institution's policy. Some allow AI as a support tool with disclosure; others prohibit it for assessed work. Always check the rules for your course and disclose assistance where required. This checker is intended to help you submit genuine, well-referenced work of your own.
Free Tools

More Free Academic Tools

Turn a Rough Draft into Polished Work

Humanise an AI-assisted draft in your own voice, or ask our academic team for expert human-written support.

Humanise My Draft Get Expert Human Help
WhatsApp